3 W. Main St, Suite 103
Irvington, NY 10533
Contact info
844.X-Caliber
(212.220.7040)
Newsletter Signup
Join Thousands of Readers Who Subscribe to Our Content.
The continuing resolution keeping HUD programs funded through Dec. 11 may be the headline this month, but several regulatory, legal and operational developments could have a more direct impact on FHA multifamily transactions.
We’ll catch you up on the latest spending deal on Capitol Hill, but first, let’s bring those under-the-radar changes to the top. Here’s what we’re watching from Washington, D.C.:

The story: Owners evaluating older multifamily properties now have a clearer view of how HUD will handle certain Fair Housing Act design and construction complaints. Under new guidance, an administrative complaint must reach HUD’s Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO) within one year after construction is completed, based on the property’s initial certificate of occupancy.
“Legacy accessibility issues have too often created uncertainty, costly retrofits, and unnecessary barriers to financing. This should provide substantially more flexibility and certainty for existing properties.”
– Former Federal Housing Commissioner Frank Cassidy
The follow-up: The guidance took effect immediately, but HUD has not yet said whether its Office of Multifamily Housing will adjust accessibility reviews, repair requirements, or closing conditions for FHA refinance transactions. Private lawsuits also remain subject to court interpretation and generally follow a separate two-year filing period.
The bottom line: The new timeline could give owners more clarity when evaluating legacy accessibility issues at existing properties. FHA multifamily borrowers should still expect appropriate accessibility diligence because the memo addresses FHEO complaint timing, not the underlying design standards or HUD’s multifamily underwriting requirements.
The story: HUD has agreed to revise its environmental review guidance after the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) sent a memo asking the agency to align its policy with the Department of the Interior’s current interpretation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. The change will clarify that HUD reviewers should not require bird surveys or construction delays solely to prevent the incidental take of migratory birds before clearing a property. The issue primarily affects FHA 221(d)(4) projects that involve new construction, substantial rehabilitation, or other site disturbance.
The follow-up: HUD plans to train staff on the revised interpretation and update internal resources, including its Environmental Assessment Factors Guide. MBA has continued working with HUD on the migratory bird policy as part of a broader effort to revise environmental review requirements.
The bottom line: The change could reduce a source of added cost and scheduling uncertainty for FHA 221(d)(4) borrowers whose projects require vegetation removal or other site work. Borrowers should continue following existing HUD requirements until the agency issues or implements the revised guidance.
The story: Property owners who incorporated funds already awarded through HUD’s Green and Resilient Retrofit Program (GRRP) into their rehabilitation plans now have greater certainty that those dollars will remain available. A federal appeals court recently upheld legal protections for existing awards, enabling affected projects to keep moving toward closing and construction.
“[HUD is] thoughtful and creative about finding ways to preserve and make the program work. It’s better to have these dollars flowing, albeit in a slightly different format, than to have the program on permanent hiatus or dead altogether.”
– Alex Rosso, Partner, Nixon Peabody, told Tax Credit Advisor in March
The follow-up: The federal government could seek further review of the ruling. In the meantime, owners with existing GRRP awards can continue coordinating with HUD to meet the current program requirements and advance their transactions. Any additional appeal would determine the longer-term legal status of the funding protections.
The bottom line: The ruling provides greater near-term certainty for borrowers with existing GRRP awards, but it doesn’t change the revised program terms or open a new application round. Current GRRP awardees have more clarity as they align the funding with their rehab scope and broader capital stack.
The story: HUD released a draft of the TRACS 203A Monthly Activity Transmission (MAT) Guide for public comment as the agency prepares to implement the Housing Opportunity Through Modernization Act (HOTMA) across its multifamily rental assistance programs. (View the text in the “drafts” section on HUD’s website.) TRACS 203A will support tenant-certification and reporting requirements that the current TRACS 202D system cannot fully accommodate. Comments are due Oct. 2.
The follow-up: Owners should review the draft for provisions that could affect their certification procedures, compliance policies, and software preparations. Comments should identify the relevant chapter, section, and page whenever possible.
The bottom line: The draft guide moves HUD closer to operationalizing HOTMA, giving multifamily owners a limited window to flag implementation concerns before the Jan. 1 compliance deadline.
The story: Owners of HUD-assisted properties don’t need to fear interruptions in near-term funding after Congress passed a continuing resolution to keep the federal government running through Dec. 11. The president signed the bill into law. Policymakers on Capitol Hill were facing a Sept. 30 deadline, when current funding would’ve expired, and have said they intend to complete the fiscal 2027 budget after the midterm elections in November.
“The passage of the CR pushes the funding fight to the end of the year, when the midterm election results and the imminent holiday season could raise the stakes for negotiation between political parties.”
– LeadingAge
The follow-up: Congress now has a new deadline to finalize full-year fiscal 2027 funding for HUD and other federal agencies. Congress could also pass another continuing resolution in December if lawmakers do not complete full-year fiscal 2027 appropriations by the new deadline.
The bottom line: The extension gives owners and developers more near-term stability as they manage HUD-assisted properties and advance transactions through the agency. It does not set HUD’s final fiscal 2027 budget, but it keeps current programs operating while Congress completes that work.
The story: HUD posted a notice of intent to reorganize on the Federal Register’s public-inspection docket Sept. 4, then withdrew it later that day before its scheduled publication. HUD did not provide an explanation for the withdrawal, and it remains unclear whether the agency will revise or revive the plan.
“Current staffing levels are almost 35% below historic staffing levels, and this reorganization will provide HUD with the ability to operate even more effectively.”
– An excerpt from the withdrawn HUD notice
The follow-up: With the notice withdrawn, the reorganization is not moving forward under the timeline described in the draft. Borrowers should watch for a revised notice or separate guidance addressing whether any future restructuring would affect multifamily staffing or processing.
The bottom line: The withdrawn plan offered few clear implications for FHA multifamily processing. If HUD issues a revised proposal that includes multifamily operations, borrowers should watch for potential effects on staffing, turnaround times, and coordination across HUD offices.
The story: HUD-assisted owners will continue working with the established network of organizations that provide fair housing education, complaint assistance, and compliance resources. A federal court temporarily directed HUD to use the previous Fair Housing Initiatives Program (FHIP) funding framework while it reviews a challenge to the agency’s proposed restructuring. HUD maintains that its updated approach is lawful and says it will continue strengthening fair housing enforcement nationwide.
“When someone is wrongfully turned away from a housing opportunity … they don’t call Washington. They call the fair housing organization in their community. This ruling means the people who answer that call are still going to be there.”
– Lisa Rice, President and CEO of the National Fair Housing Alliance, said in a statement
The follow-up: The temporary order does not resolve the broader lawsuit brought by fair housing groups, and HUD is reviewing its legal options. Unless the court changes its order, HUD will use the previous framework to distribute the fiscal 2025 funding.
The bottom line: For multifamily owners, the ruling does not change existing Fair Housing Act obligations or day-to-day responsibilities around reasonable accommodations and accessibility. It does, however, preserve access to local fair housing education and complaint-resolution resources that can help owners and residents navigate these requirements.
Connect with our team to discuss financing solutions and execution designed to support your project’s long-term success as HUD policy continues to evolve.